Construction Schedule Health Review
A focused review can reveal schedule weaknesses before they become owner comments, unreliable forecasts or missed milestones.
Discuss Your Project →Pathline reviews the current Primavera P6 file and supporting requirements to determine whether the schedule is technically sound, contract-aware and usable for project management.
What This Service Includes
- Open ends and missing-logic review
- Constraint and negative-float analysis
- High-duration, high-float and lags review
- Critical and near-critical path validation
- Out-of-sequence progress and status-quality checks
- Calendar, coding and milestone review
- Prioritized findings with recommended corrective actions
How Pathline Approaches the Work
Receive the File
Collect the XER, schedule specification and current narrative or reports.
Run Diagnostics
Combine quantitative health checks with a construction-focused logic review.
Trace Key Paths
Validate what controls contractual and management milestones.
Explain the Findings
Provide prioritized corrections and a clear discussion of project impact.
Who This Helps
Contractors preparing a baseline or update submittal, owners reviewing a contractor schedule, and project teams that do not trust the current forecast.
Common Questions
Is this only a DCMA 14-point assessment?
No. Quantitative checks are useful, but Pathline also reviews construction sequence, path credibility and management usability.
Will Pathline repair the schedule?
The initial review identifies findings. Corrections can be incorporated as a separate scope or completed collaboratively with the project scheduler.
What files are required?
The current XER and schedule requirements are the primary inputs. Prior updates, narratives and milestone lists improve the review when available.
Put the Schedule to Work
Tell us what you are building, where the project stands, and what the schedule needs to accomplish.